English 125: Justice, Political Thought and Action
12/11/12
Flying While Arab
“I
feel violated, humiliated and sure that I was taken from the plane simply
because of my appearance…” wrote Shoshana Hebshi, a U.S. citizen and daughter
of a Saudi Arabian, on her blog
in 2011. Upon flying home from a trip, Hebshi’s plane was forced to land, and
she and two other men taken away. Hebshi was handcuffed and held for four
hours, and denied the right to her phone or other personal belongings. As she
continued to say, “I was forced into a situation where I was stripped of my
freedom and liberty…"1. Upon hearing this story, one
might wonder what it was about Hebshi that caused her to be arrested. The
answer to this is simple: she looked like a terrorist: Arab.
The Twin Towers as the second plane driven by terrorists hits 2 |
Since
the terrorist attack of September 11th, 2001, airports have
constantly been striving to prevent future attacks by raising security, but one
method they have used is crossing a line: the racial profiling of Arab or Arab
looking passengers. This means that the TSA has scouted out anyone who fits the
terrorist profile or “a person wearing a beard or a hijab”, and pulled them out
of lines, off airplanes, and denied them the right to fly, even when there is
no other indication of wrongdoing3.
Though the TSA maintains that this action is only for raising security,
is this really the standard we want at our airports? I for one think that such
an action is unjust from the moment the TSA marks out their target to the
moment the person is released to go about their business. As exemplified in the
case of Shoshana Hebshi, I find that racial profiling enables discriminatory
and dehumanizing action, and as such should be expunged from our airports.
For a country such as the U.S., whose very
constitution upholds the liberty and equality of people, it is surprising to me
that something such as racial profiling is allowed. Race and ethnic origin are
not supposed to be the factors that dictate how someone is to be treated, and
are especially not supposed to be used to separate one group from another. In
this, I am agreeing with Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.’s vision in which justice
is attained through treating all people equally, regardless of appearance.
However, when Arabs are pulled out of line, how is that not
inequality through racial discrimination and segregation? They are literally
separated from the rest of the passengers, and made to go through their own
special screening so as to board the airplane just because of how they look. This is segregation in the most basic sense,
and as King stated, “All segregation statutes are unjust because segregation distorts the
soul and damages the personality. It gives… the segregated a false sense of
inferiority”4. Just recall how Hebshi felt, or the hundreds
of stories others5have posted
about their experiences, and you can see the humiliation and feelings and inferiority
this practice has caused. This in no way promotes the equality and justice
America is supposed to stand for, and is not the way we should be defending
ourselves against terrorists.
There are people however, who agree with
racially profiling Arabs at the airports. One common argument for continuing
the practice is the idea that Arabs, as a group,
are inherently angry and violent towards outsiders, i.e. the U.S. Recently, Newsweek
even released an article that supported such ideas, stating that Arab “men and
women who support—whether actively or passively—the idea that blasphemers
deserve to suffer punishment are not a fringe group. On the contrary, they
represent the mainstream...”6. When sources such as these
report about Arabs as being a violent group, it stands to reason that people
will believe this.
FBI agents help lead Timothy McVeigh from an Oklahoma courthouse on April 21, 1995. AP Photo 7 . |
But is it really fair
to blame an entire group for the actions of a few? Can it really be said that
over 300 million people are associated with terrorists simply because they look
a certain way, or come from a certain place? I think this is in a way
irrational; recall for example of the Oklahoma
Citybombing 8. Although at first it was believed that the perpetrator was Arab, when it was revealed to be Timothy McVeigh law enforcement agencies did not single out all white males or ex-Army soldiers as possible terrorists. McVeigh is viewed as a deviant individual, so shouldn’t it be the same with Arabs?
Citybombing 8. Although at first it was believed that the perpetrator was Arab, when it was revealed to be Timothy McVeigh law enforcement agencies did not single out all white males or ex-Army soldiers as possible terrorists. McVeigh is viewed as a deviant individual, so shouldn’t it be the same with Arabs?
Picture of a scene from Delta Force, showing negative views of Arabs 9 |
Also, these ideas that all or most Arabs are
out to harm the U.S. and are terrorists does not come from mathematical fact,
but from decades of cultural imperialism against them. As described by Iris Young, cultural
imperialism is how “… the dominant group constructs the differences which some
groups exhibit as lack and negation. These groups become marked as “Other”,”
which are “often attached to their bodies and which cannot easily be denied …” 10. Since the 1970’s Arabs have been marked out within American society and
constantly portrayed as the villains or unscrupulous characters. The
demonization of all Arabs as violent and terrorists is only a continuation of
the pattern that has now affected airport policies. When
we see only one portrayal of a group, believe it, and act on it as we do in
airports, we essentially dehumanize the group by marking them as “other” and
rejecting them from our society.
This video clip by
internationally acclaimed author and media critic Jack Shaheen, talks about such characterizations in his documentary Reel Bad Arabs. (For
Shaheen’s full video, click here
11).
So
then what about the problem at the root of all of this? What do we do about
scouting out terrorists? To be honest, there is no surefire way to prevent
terrorist actions, but there are other effective methods that can be used
without the racial segregation and dehumanization.
One
way happens to be very simple: random
and behavioral profiling. To pick out random
people—of all backgrounds— or look for certain behaviors can actually be more effective than racial profiling for
two reasons. First, as Bruce Schneier, a security technologist and author of several
books on computer security stated, “… [racial] profiling creates
two paths through security: one with less scrutiny and one with more…you invite
the terrorists to take the path with less scrutiny…”13. Random and behavioral profiling would eliminate this problem; all
people would have a chance of being pulled over, so terrorists could not
exploit American stereotypes. Second, random and behavioral profiling would
eliminate the problem of repeatability. Racial profiling “devotes heightenedresources to innocent people—and then devotes those resources to themrepeatedly even after they’ve been cleared as innocent…”
14, so
attention is not being given to the right people. Random and behavioral would
solve this problem; with random sampling there is a smaller chance that a
person will be pulled over multiple times, and profiling based on suspicious
behaviors has a better chance than racial profiling does of catching
terrorists. In the end, these ways of scouting out terrorists can be just or
even more so effective than racial profiling, minus the racial discrimination
and dehumanization.
Political Cartoon of Racial Profiling of Muslim Arabs 15 |
In
no way am I trying to negate that there have been Arab terrorists, such as
those who committed 9/11. However, in this time of anxiety over terrorism,
peeling back the rights people have gained in this country in no way helps to
stop our enemies. In fact, such actions as racial profiling destroy the very
liberties we are trying to protect. So let’s try to calm down, think
rationally, and give Arabs just as much consideration as others in our airports.
To see how others are fighting to change views on Arabs through sarcasm, check out the Daily Show16
Works Cited:
[1] Daniel
P. Finney, “Airport
detainee says she was a victim of racial profiling,” The Des Moines Register, September
14th, 2011, http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/nation/story/2011-09-14/detroit-airline-detainee-racial-profiling/50400268/1
[2] Twin Towers, JPEG, Source: http://ncca.us/why-did-they-choose-september-11/
[3] Delinda C. Hanley, "It's Time to End Racial,
Religious and Ethnic Profiling of Americans." The Washington Report on
Middle East Affairs 31, no. 4 (2012): 27-28.
http://search.proquest.com/docview/1027759166?accountid=14667.
[4] Dr. Martin
Luther King Jr. “Letter from Birmingham Jail” 3, August
1953
[5] Susan
Lau, “Racial profiling at airports unfairly targets Muslims” TheLowell.org, September 21, 2006, http://www.thelowell.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1859
[7] Source: The FBI, “Terror Hits Home: The Oklahoma City
Bombing” The Federal Bureau of
Investigation, http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/history/famous-cases/oklahoma-city-bombing
[8] ibid
[9] Delta Force, JPEG,
Source: http://possumstew.wordpress.com/2009/08/07/jihadis-skinheads-and-film-representation/
[10] Iris Marion Young,
“Five Faces of Oppression” Justice and
the Politics of Difference, 58-60
[11] Jack Shaheen, “Reel
Bad Arabs” March 6, 2011, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r4157QYY3o4
[12] ibid, part 4, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8UoTMiOT3t4
[13] The Editors, “Will
Profiling Make a Difference?” The New York Times, January 4, 2010,
http://roomfordebate.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/01/04/will-profiling-make-a-difference/
[14] Emily
Badger, “Hey TSA, Racial Profiling Doesn’t Work” Pacific Standard, November 30, 2010, http://www.psmag.com/culture/hey-tsa-racial-profiling-doesnt-work-25725/
[15] Political Cartoon,
JPEG, Source: http://barenakedislam.files.wordpress.com/2010/12/khalil-bendib-muslim-class.jpg?w=460&h=346
[16] John Stewart, “The
Daily Show” Comedy Central, October
14, 2008, http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/tue-october-14-2008/an-arab-family-man
Maddy, I really liked this post and I have just a few comments. First of all, I'd like to say that I agree with your argument and what it stands for. However, to play devils advocate, one could argue that in past times, the American government has taken away personal freedoms from their citizens for the good of the country. I think that is one of the main excuses for racial profiling.
ReplyDeleteMaddy, I agree with your arguments made in this post. Having a predetermined bias for the TSA makes it easier for real threats to pass by if they don't fit the "stereotypical terrorist" profile. Derrick, it is true that the government has taken away personal freedoms in the past, but the legitimate "good of the country" is always in question. The Patriot act, the one that gave the government the right to wire tap all phones without a warrant, is one that didn't really reap any results. The Japanese camps during World War two were extremely unnecessary, especially because people who were here for years and years were all of a sudden thought to be an enemy of the state. It took away the rights of a few for what good? The same argument goes with gun control. People being taken away their rights for the "good of the country". But people get extremely defensive of their right to guns. Why? because nobody wants to have THEIR rights taken away, but they won't care enough to stand up for someone else getting theirs taken away. Overall, great post Maddy!
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDelete