Fernando
Mota
Professor
Bonnie
English
125-019
December
10, 2012
Raised into a family that has had beliefs instilled into
them from older generations is not always ideal for those that have become more
modernized. New customs that have been
recently introduced to these older generation families are most of the time frowned
upon. A good example of this would be
the existence of same sex couples as well as same sex couples fighting to
marry. Gays are not welcomed with open
arms into such families.
I,
myself, was raised in a family that matched those beliefs. My family consists of my father, my mother,
my three older sisters, my older brother, and my younger brother. I am the first in our family to be born in
the United States. Neither my father nor
my mother is accustomed to all of new environments and people that we are now
around in this new country. They are
both used to the old customs of our culture and can be quite stubborn to
change. Gay couples were not an
exception. My parents did not agree with
the ideas that people of the same sex can be together. By some twist of fate, my parents were
shocked to learn that one of their daughters is gay. Immediately, my father took action and
disowned his eighteen year old daughter. My father could not bare the fact that his own daughter was a lesbian. He was disgusted. My sister fled her home and went off to live in California.
I
suppose that some people don’t give up old mindsets nor open
up to the new reality that same sex couples are becoming quite prevalent. Of course, it does not help that gays have
been portrayed in the past to be a bad thing.
Thats so Gay - Photo [3] |
Whenever
something unpleasant was to happen, people would call the situation gay. They would not mean that the situation is
homosexual but instead they would give the word “gay,” an alternative
definition; in this reference, they would have the word mean "something that you find stupid, dumb, idiotic, pointless, and or annoying.”[1] "That's so gay" has been part of the adolescent lexicon for some time."[2] This being said, it is obvious as to why same sex couples are looked at
as being a negative thing. This thought
is one of the main reasons as to why people are not allowing same sex couples
to marry.
I
argue that we should make it a federal law to allow same sex couples to marry
in the United States. This law would
bring forth justice to America. Not
allowing gays to marry would make for an unequal balance of power in the
country. It would mean that the U.S.
would be favoring the heterosexuals more than others. John Stuart Mill, a philosopher, wrote that “…it is, by universal
admission, inconsistent with justice to be partial; to show favor or preference
to one person over another, in matters to which favor and preference do not
properly apply,” [4]. John Stuart Mill says that it is not fair if you show preference to one person over another. If you are showing preference to heterosexuals over gays then it is not justice. According to that quote, it is suggestive
that Mill would agree that it would be just for gays to be allowed to marry.
Some people would say that
gay marriage should not be legal because they believe that people would get
married just for health insurance benefits or other benefits that can be gained
through marriage[5]. These people claim
that allowing gays to marry would provoke people to just get married to obtain
those benefits, thus to commit a fraud.
I, in turn, argue that people already commit these frauds today as
heterosexual couples. Investigators are
sent out to see who are those that are getting married because of love and
those who are getting married because of benefits. The same thing can be done to those that are
gay and married. There would be no
change to that system of fraud detection.
I Now Pronounce You Chuck and Larry [6]
Martin Luther King defines
justice as being equality [7] .
Therefore, in order to obtain equality, gays must have the same rights
that everyone else has; ergo the right to marry. The right to marry, whether same sex or opposite sex, should be a universal
right to all in the country, in order to achieve greater justice.
What
some do not realize is that gays have contributed greatly to this country.
Famous Gays [8]
As
you can see, gays have made contributions to this country that some cannot live
without. They are doctors and lawyers that
have saved lives. It may be possible
that you may find your own life saved by one of them. If one does not
think it in that manner, than I also argue that their contributions to this
world has earned them a right to get married. Gays should be allowed to marry in order to obtain true equality.
Years after my sister had left to California, my father realized the error of his ways. He called my sister to apologize but she did not answer. My father simply left a voice mail apologizing for his ignorance. He feared that he has lost his daughter due to his narrow mindedness. Three days after the phone call, a knock is heard at the door. My father opens the door only to find that my sister had came home. She was not alone. A woman stood next to her holding her hand. My father gave them a hug and said, "Bienvenido a la familia, Marcela!"
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Works Cited
[1] Turner, Tyler. "Urban Dictionary: Gay." Urban Dictionary. N.p., 22 Mar. 2008. Web. 8 Dec. 2012. <http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=gay>.
[2] "'That's So Gay' Phrase Has Lasting Impact For LGBT Youth, Study Finds."Huffingtonpost.com. N.p., 28 Aug.. 2012. Web. 08 Dec. 2012. <http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/08/28/thats-so-gay-phrase-impact-lgbt-youth_n_1837330.html>
[3] Brandonaz. "LGBT That's so Gay." That's so Gay. BuzzMedia Entertainment, Nov. 2012. Web. 08 Dec. 2012. <http://www.fanpop.com/clubs/lgbt/images/32624188/title/thats-gay-photo>.
[4] Mill, John Stuart. "Utilitarianism." Utilitarianism by John Stuart Mill.
N.p., n.d. Web. 11 Oct. 2012. <http://www.utilitarianism.com/mill1.htm>.
[2] "'That's So Gay' Phrase Has Lasting Impact For LGBT Youth, Study Finds."Huffingtonpost.com. N.p., 28 Aug.. 2012. Web. 08 Dec. 2012. <http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/08/28/thats-so-gay-phrase-impact-lgbt-youth_n_1837330.html>
[3] Brandonaz. "LGBT That's so Gay." That's so Gay. BuzzMedia Entertainment, Nov. 2012. Web. 08 Dec. 2012. <http://www.fanpop.com/clubs/lgbt/images/32624188/title/thats-gay-photo>.
[5] "The Gay Marriage Fraud." Topix. N.p., 13 May 2011. Web. 8 Dec. 2012. <http://www.topix.com/forum/state/mn/T4AN1J9A8NGLH2TJ1>.
[6] Ipronounceyou. "I Now Pronounce You Chuck And Larry." YouTube. YouTube, 19 July 2007. Web. 8 Dec. 2012.
[7] King, Martin Luther, Jr. "Letter From Birmingham Jail." N.p., n.d. Web. 11 Oct. 2012.
<http://web.cn.edu/kwheeler/documents/letter_birmingham_jail.pdf>.
[8] Wurstol1. "Famous Gays in History." YouTube. YouTube, 28 July 2008. Web. 8 Dec. 2012.
Fernando,
ReplyDeleteYour blog post was intriguing and enlightening. It made me realize how commonly the word "gay" is used in a negative way. For example, I have even used the word "gay" in this way and I am a supporter of homosexual rights. It is a shame that our society has changed the context of this word.
I really like your counter argument that homosexual couples and heterosexual couples both could use marriage for legal gains. This argument made me realize that legal benefits should not differ due to someone's sexual orientation. I also really enjoyed the video clip from "I Now Pronounce You Chuck and Larry", because it applied this argument to a current topic and added some humor to this debate.
However, I do have two suggestions. When you talk the public using the work "gay" in a negative way and how this prevents homosexual rights from being equal to heterosexual rights, you should give credit to the fact that half of America supports the legalization of same-sex marriage today. If you were to add this stat to your argument, you could then say "Due to half the country supporting same-sex marriage, now is the time for a federal law to be passed to legalize same-sex marriage."
My second suggestion is that you could expand upon the "unequal balance of power" argument. It seemed like you glossed over this point which caused me to be a little confused at what it means. It sounds intriguing I just need to know more about what it means.
Overall I really enjoyed reading your blog post and was very convinced by the persuasiveness of your argument.
From,
Greg Yaros